Vote-escrowed (ve) tokenomics started with Curve Finance in 2020. Lock CRV for up to 4 years, receive veCRV. veCRV holders vote on which pools get CRV emissions and earn a share of protocol fees. This design created the Curve Wars.
The Curve mechanism
- You hold CRV. Lock it for 1-4 years to receive veCRV.
- Lock length determines voting power (4 years = 1:1, 1 year = 0.25 veCRV per CRV).
- veCRV votes on gauge weights: which pools get CRV emissions each week.
- Higher emissions = higher LP APR = deeper liquidity for that pool.
- veCRV also earns 50% of Curve's trading fees.
The Curve Wars
Stablecoin issuers (Frax, Alchemix, MIM, later Convex) realized: if they controlled enough veCRV, they could direct emissions to their own pools, deepening liquidity for their stables at Curve's cost. Convex emerged as an aggregator: users deposit CRV, get cvxCRV, and Convex uses aggregated voting power to direct emissions to paying bribers.
ve(3,3): Solidly and Aerodrome
Andre Cronje's 2022 innovation. veCRV holders were diluted by every new emission. In ve(3,3), veholders get a share of new emissions proportional to their voting power. This eliminates the dilution issue.
- Solidly / Solidly Labs. Original launch on Fantom.
- Velodrome. Optimism port; became flagship DEX.
- Aerodrome. Base port; became flagship DEX on Base with hundreds of millions in TVL.
Why it works
- Aligns long-term holders with protocol growth.
- Attracts liquidity to specific pools via emissions.
- Creates a market for bribes (paying veholders to vote for your pool).
Where it fails
- Long lockups reduce liquidity of the underlying token.
- Bribe economies can become extractive (protocol pays more in bribes than it earns).
- Governance concentration risk (a few whales control votes).
Koinlytics